MANILA, Philippines — Malacañang on Monday challenged Pacifico “Curlee” Discaya II and Cezarah “Sarah” to substantiate their claims that lawmakers and other people in government demanded “cuts” from infrastructure projects.
Palace to Discayas: Prove allegations

The Discayas during a hearing of the Senate Blue Ribbon Committee said they were coerced by several members of the House of Representatives and personnel from the Department of Public Works and Highways to give bribe money for their construction firms to win government project bids.
, This news data comes from:http://jyxingfa.com
In a briefing with the media delegation covering President Ferdinand Marcos Jr.’s state visit in Cambodia, Presidential Communications Office Undersecretary and Palace Press Officer Claire Castro said it is not enough for the couple to mention names.
“It's hard to just drop names. Their evidence needs to be complete. Not everyone mentioned is guilty. We still need complete evidence so that when it's brought to court, it won't be dismissed right away,” she said in Filipino.
“What the President wants is a wide-ranging investigation to uncover the truth. He does not want names to be dropped without evidence. But if the allegations are significant and can be proven by witnesses regarding the involvement of certain politicians, the President will accept that,” she added.
- COA flags fraud in P342M Bulacan flood control projects
- Pope declares 'God's influencer' first millennial saint
- Xi slams 'bullying' in speech to regional leaders at summit
- House committee subpoenas Sarah Discaya, 4 other contractors over flood control project anomalies
- Discaya companies' licenses revoked for bid-rigging
- No peace without end to hostilities –Arab bloc
- Repairs on Chinese ship in Bajo de Masinloc collision may take 2 months - PH Navy
- House probe tackles flood control corruption: Lawmakers disclose conflicts of interest
- Social media erupts: Politicians' children face backlash for flaunting wealth
- NBI slaps Alice Guo, 35 Others with new graft, misconduct cases